One page – 6hours | Education homework help

 

1
No Evidence
0.00%

2
Nominal Evidence
69.00%

3
Unacceptable Evidence
74.00%

4
Acceptable Evidence
87.00%

5
Target Evidence
100.00%

70.0 %Content

 

15.0 %Lesson Plan Content

No submission.

Lesson plan does not include learning objectives and instructional activities related to the Measurement and Data domain; modifying and extending skills taught in the lesson plan and aligning to the identified learning target/s.

Lesson plan includes inappropriate instructional activities related to the Measurement and Data domain; modifying and extending skills taught in the lesson plan and aligning to the identified learning target/s.

Lesson plan includes appropriate instructional activities related to the Measurement and Data domain; modifying and extending skills taught in the lesson plan and aligning to the identified learning target/s.

Lesson plan includes engaging instructional activities related to the Measurement and Data domain; modifying and extending skills taught in the lesson plan and aligning to the identified learning target/s.

 

10.0 %PLANNING: Instructional Script and Materials

No submission.

Lesson plan does not use effective, verbal, nonverbal techniques in a way that would create opportunities for learning and collaboration.

Lesson plan does not adequately address student or class needs, and/or include thinly designed use of verbal, nonverbal techniques to create opportunities for learning and collaboration.

Lesson plan includes basic, appropriate use of student-centered verbal, nonverbal techniques to create opportunities for learning and collaboration.

Lesson plan demonstrates well-developed and skillful use of effective, student-centered verbal, nonverbal techniques to create opportunities for active inquiry, collaboration and supportive interaction.

 

10.0 %PLANNING: Meeting the Varied Learning Needs of Students

No submission.

Lesson plan instruction and instructional supports ignores the learning needs of the students.

Lesson plan does not fully differentiate instructional activities and supports. It inadequately addresses the needs of the students.

Lesson plan includes basic differentiated instructional activities and supports that are designed to generally meet the needs of students.

Lesson plan has creative, well-developed differentiated instructional activities and supports clearly designed to meet the needs of specific individuals or groups with similar needs.

 

10.0 %PLANNING: Meeting the Language Needs of Students

No submission.

Planned assessments do not clearly measure the stated learning targets, and/or do not include modifications for the individual needs of the student.

Lesson plan only cursorily describes content-based vocabulary and includes underdeveloped instructional support for the use of vocabulary and additional language demands associated with the language function.

Lesson plan identifies content-based vocabulary and includes general instructional support for the use of vocabulary and additional language demands associated with the language function.

Lesson plan clearly and comprehensively incorporates content-based vocabulary, targeted instructional support for the use of vocabulary, and additional language demands associated with the language function.

 

10.0 %PLANNING: Assessments to Monitor Student Learning

No submission.

Planned assessments do not clearly measure the stated learning targets, and/or do not include modifications for the individual needs of the student.

Planned assessments are inadequate for monitoring the understanding and skill development of students in the content area. Assessments are not well aligned to the stated learning targets and do not include adequate modifications for the individual student.

Planned assessments provide clear, basic methods to monitor the deep understanding and skill development of students in the content area throughout and at the end of the lesson. Assessments are generally aligned to the stated learning targets and include simple modifications for the individual student.

Planned assessments creatively allow for multiple forms of evidence in order to monitor the understanding and skill development of students in the content area throughout and at the end of the lesson. Assessments are well aligned with the stated learning targets and standards and include well-crafted modifications for the individual needs of students.

 

15.0 %Communication Device Rationale

No submission.

Communication device rationale in supporting choices specific to the individual students, to include the established learning targets.

Communication device rationale is insufficient in supporting choices specific to the individual students, to include the established learning targets.

Communication device rationale is sufficient in supporting choices specific to the individual students, to include the established learning targets.

Communication device rationale is comprehensive and professional in supporting choices specific to the individual students, to include the established learning targets.

 

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

20.0 %Mechanics

No submission.

The lesson plan contains inappropriate, incoherent language and/or sentence structures.

The lesson plan contains mechanical and conventional errors or non-relevant language that affects meaning and clarity.

The lesson plan has a few mechanical and conventional errors present that do not significantly affect meaning or clarity. Word choice reflects basic, consistent, appropriate use of practice and topic-related language.

The lesson plan is free of mechanical and conventional errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and topic-related language.

 

10.0 %Format

 

5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)

No submission.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

 

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

 

100 %Total Weightage

 

 

 

1
No Evidence
0.00%

2
Nominal Evidence
69.00%

3
Unacceptable Evidence
74.00%

4
Acceptable Evidence
87.00%

5
Target Evidence
100.00%

70.0 %Content

 

15.0 %Lesson Plan Content

No submission.

Lesson plan does not include learning objectives and instructional activities related to the Measurement and Data domain; modifying and extending skills taught in the lesson plan and aligning to the identified learning target/s.

Lesson plan includes inappropriate instructional activities related to the Measurement and Data domain; modifying and extending skills taught in the lesson plan and aligning to the identified learning target/s.

Lesson plan includes appropriate instructional activities related to the Measurement and Data domain; modifying and extending skills taught in the lesson plan and aligning to the identified learning target/s.

Lesson plan includes engaging instructional activities related to the Measurement and Data domain; modifying and extending skills taught in the lesson plan and aligning to the identified learning target/s.

 

10.0 %PLANNING: Instructional Script and Materials

No submission.

Lesson plan does not use effective, verbal, nonverbal techniques in a way that would create opportunities for learning and collaboration.

Lesson plan does not adequately address student or class needs, and/or include thinly designed use of verbal, nonverbal techniques to create opportunities for learning and collaboration.

Lesson plan includes basic, appropriate use of student-centered verbal, nonverbal techniques to create opportunities for learning and collaboration.

Lesson plan demonstrates well-developed and skillful use of effective, student-centered verbal, nonverbal techniques to create opportunities for active inquiry, collaboration and supportive interaction.

 

10.0 %PLANNING: Meeting the Varied Learning Needs of Students

No submission.

Lesson plan instruction and instructional supports ignores the learning needs of the students.

Lesson plan does not fully differentiate instructional activities and supports. It inadequately addresses the needs of the students.

Lesson plan includes basic differentiated instructional activities and supports that are designed to generally meet the needs of students.

Lesson plan has creative, well-developed differentiated instructional activities and supports clearly designed to meet the needs of specific individuals or groups with similar needs.

 

10.0 %PLANNING: Meeting the Language Needs of Students

No submission.

Planned assessments do not clearly measure the stated learning targets, and/or do not include modifications for the individual needs of the student.

Lesson plan only cursorily describes content-based vocabulary and includes underdeveloped instructional support for the use of vocabulary and additional language demands associated with the language function.

Lesson plan identifies content-based vocabulary and includes general instructional support for the use of vocabulary and additional language demands associated with the language function.

Lesson plan clearly and comprehensively incorporates content-based vocabulary, targeted instructional support for the use of vocabulary, and additional language demands associated with the language function.

 

10.0 %PLANNING: Assessments to Monitor Student Learning

No submission.

Planned assessments do not clearly measure the stated learning targets, and/or do not include modifications for the individual needs of the student.

Planned assessments are inadequate for monitoring the understanding and skill development of students in the content area. Assessments are not well aligned to the stated learning targets and do not include adequate modifications for the individual student.

Planned assessments provide clear, basic methods to monitor the deep understanding and skill development of students in the content area throughout and at the end of the lesson. Assessments are generally aligned to the stated learning targets and include simple modifications for the individual student.

Planned assessments creatively allow for multiple forms of evidence in order to monitor the understanding and skill development of students in the content area throughout and at the end of the lesson. Assessments are well aligned with the stated learning targets and standards and include well-crafted modifications for the individual needs of students.

 

15.0 %Communication Device Rationale

No submission.

Communication device rationale in supporting choices specific to the individual students, to include the established learning targets.

Communication device rationale is insufficient in supporting choices specific to the individual students, to include the established learning targets.

Communication device rationale is sufficient in supporting choices specific to the individual students, to include the established learning targets.

Communication device rationale is comprehensive and professional in supporting choices specific to the individual students, to include the established learning targets.

 

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

20.0 %Mechanics

No submission.

The lesson plan contains inappropriate, incoherent language and/or sentence structures.

The lesson plan contains mechanical and conventional errors or non-relevant language that affects meaning and clarity.

The lesson plan has a few mechanical and conventional errors present that do not significantly affect meaning or clarity. Word choice reflects basic, consistent, appropriate use of practice and topic-related language.

The lesson plan is free of mechanical and conventional errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and topic-related language.

 

10.0 %Format

 

5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)

No submission.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

 

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

 

100 %Total Weightage